The full account appears in a paper to be published in Nature Thursday (24 October), page 685. A discussion of the work, by Adriano Aguzzi and Charles Weissmann, appears in the same issue on page 666.
"What you have there are the abstracts that came with the articles. The actual thing was really quite complex.An attempt was made to electrophorese purified PrPsc derived from CJD of different types. The electrophoretic pattern that was seen was well divided into 4 kinds. The first was the sporadic CJD that appears from nowhere and no cause is known, the second is the centrally inoculated CJD that comes from another person, the third was the peripherally inoculated CJD that they find coming in thepatients that received contamiated growth hormone. The fourth type, which could be easily separated from the others was that of the new variant CJD. When this was compared with the electrophoretic patterns found when BSE in cats, macaque monkeys, and mice is tested, it was found to be the same. i.e. the CJD type 4 was the same as the other BSEs. This evidence is very strong that BSE gve rise to new variant CJD.
One of the most important findings was that it is the sugar molecules (glycan chains) that are on the prion protein at positions 181 and 197 that decide the strain of disease as it is those molecules that caused the variance in the electrophoretic patterns.
The importance of these findings is not simply because it shows BSE to have probably infected humans, but also means that we may actually be able to treat the disease (see Dealler in Medical Hypotheses 1994;42:69-72) and that we may actually be able to diagnose the disease in asymptomatic people by looking at other tissues, perhaps their blood. This might seem a long way off but it may well not be so. The article by Aguzzi and Weissman was not really perfect in that it made a few errors. Anyway, it attempted to explain the articles. See my latest scientific research page. At the moment there is a furore in the press here about this. One set says that we will all die and the other says that there may be a way out."
Regards,
Steve Dealler
Adriano Aguzzi and Charles Weissmann
A suspicious signature Nature 383, 666-667 (1994)
All the evidence so far linking the new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob (CJD) disease with bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) has been merely circumstantial. Now, laboratory studies
comparing the various strains of prion responsible for the diseases have established a
physical link between this new disease and BSE.
Adriano Aguzzi and Charles Weissmann Prof. Dr. med. Adriano Aguzzi (MRCPath) Professor of Neuropathology and Head, National Reference Center for Human Prion Diseases Institute of Neuropathology University Hospital of Z¸rich Schmelzbergstrasse 12 CH-8091 Z¸rich, Switzerland Tel. ++41-1-255 2107 or 255 2869 Fax: ++41-1-255 4402 pager: ++41-1-255 1111, ask for 124 482The nature of the infectious agent, the prion, causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) is the subject of one of the most passionate controversies of contemporary biology. In addition to its academic aspects, this question now impinges on a grave issue of public health: the possible linkage between bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and vCJD, a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) which has primarily affected young individuals in Great Britain1 but also one in France2 (Table 1).
This linkage is plausible since a variety of animals can acquire BSE through oral administration of BSE-infected cattle brain. A paper by Collinge and coworkers3 provides an exciting new approach for tracing the passage of individual prion strains within and between species. TSEs are transmitted by an agent which apparently lacks informational nucleic acids4. This, along with an impressive body of genetic evidence5-7, led to the hypothesis that the prion consists solely of the modified form of a protein, named PrPC, which is encoded by a singular host gene8-10. The conjectured infectious form of PrP has been designated as PrP*11.
An abnormal form of PrPC, called PrPres or PrPSc and characterized by its partial resistance to proteolytic digestion and its tendency to aggregate, accumulates during the advanced stages of most cases of TSEs and has therefore been equated with PrP*. PrPC and PrPres appear to be chemically identical and may therefore represent conformational isomers. PrPres is thought to propagate by interacting with PrPC and causing its conversion into PrPres. As predicted by the "protein only" hypothesis, PrPC is essential for propagation of infectivity12, for clinical disease12 and brain pathology13.
The "protein only" hypothesis accounts readily for all findings but one, namely the occurrence of distinct prion strains which can be propagated indefinitely in hosts homozygous in regard to their PrP genes. Prion strains are defined by the incubation time or by the pattern of brain lesions14. Stable prion strains would be easily explained if the infectious agent were virus-like: strains would then be encoded by the viral genome. If, however, the prion is a conformational isoform of PrPC, then all its phenotypic characteristics should be solely determined by the host PrP genes and any prion strain should, after a few passages, become monomorphic.
How can the existence of strains be explained by the "protein only" hypothesis? Three possibilities have been suggested. (1) PrP* or PrPres is associated with an accessory molecule, such as a small nucleic acid15 which modulates the prion's phenotype without being essential for infectivity. No evidence for a nucleic acid of this kind has been adduced. (2) PrP* undergoes secondary modifications, such as glycosylation, and particular glycans specifically target the molecule to cells which in turn glycosylate PrP in an identical fashion (the "target cell hypothesis", Meyer, personal commun.) (3) PrP* or PrPres exists in various different conformations (at least one for each prion strain), and each type of prion is capable of imparting its own conformation to the PrPC molecule with which it interacts. More than one protein chemist has declared this idea to be unworldly - and yet this is precisely what is implied by a growing number of studies.
Western analysis for PrP from extracts of normal or prion-infected brains reveals three major bands, corresponding to PrP carrying two, one or no N-attached glycans. Protease treatment degrades all PrP in the case of normal brain and leads to increased mobility of the three species in prion-infected brain, due to amino terminal truncation. Presumably the changed conformation of PrPres protects a large part of the molecule against degradation. It was first shown by Bessen and Marsh16 that two strains of prions derived from mink, when propagated in inbred Syrian hamsters, give rise to PrPres molecules with distinct and heritable migration patterns after proteinase K treatment. This mobility difference was shown to be due to cleavage at distinct sites.
The most common form of prion disease in man, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), occurs in four forms: a familial form, linked to mutations in the PrP gene, an acquired or iatrogenic form, due to inadvertent parenteral exposure to CJD-contaminated materials, notably human cadaveric growth hormone, variant CJD, which is attributed to ingestion of BSE-contaminated bovine products and sporadic CJD, the most common form, which is of unknown etiology. Recently, Parchi et al. demonstrated that protease-treated PrPres in sporadic CJD can exhibit two mobility patterns which in conjunction with a Met/Val polymorphism at codon 129 specify four distinct clinical entities17.
Collinge and colleagues have now extended these observations to iatrogenic and vCJD. In addition to the mobility of protease-treated PrPres, they investigate the relative intensity of the three bands that reflect the glycosylation state. On this basis they define 4 "types" of pattern. Protease-digested PrPres from sporadic CJD cases gave rise to type 1 or type 2 patterns and that from iatrogenic cases predominantly to type 3 pattern. Astonishingly, all vCJD samples were uniformly of the type 4 pattern, which was not seen in any other form of CJD. In addition, brains of BSE cattle, as wells as of cats and Kudu who are believed to have acquired BSE, and macaques with experimental BSE showed a type 4 pattern, which is mainly characterized by a high proportion of diglycosylated PrPres, as compared to a low value in the other patterns.
All forms of human spongiform encephalopathies have been transmitted to wild type mice or mice transgenic for the human PrP genes; as summarized in Fig. 1, sporadic or iatrogenic CJDs with type 1, 2 or 3 patterns give rise to type 2 or type 3 patterns in mice carrying human transgenes, while BSE-cattle brain gave rise to a type 4 pattern in wild type mice, again with characteristically high content of diglycosylated species. Thus the conjectured conformational specificity is conserved after transfer between species. The patterns given by vCJD after transmission to the mouse have not yet been reported but are awaited with interest.
How do the different patterns come about? As set forth above, the different mobilities of protease-treated PrPres are ascribed to differing conformations and this is also true for the bands corresponding to non-glycosylated PrP, so that the variability cannot be ascribed to variable glycans. Closer inspection of the Western blots suggests that even within a single pattern type there is variability in the mobility, so that there may be even more different conformations represented among the samples. The unique feature of the type 4 pattern, namely the high ratio of diglycosylated to unglycosylated PrP may reflect increased susceptibility of the diglycosylated form to BSE-mediated conformational change. Alternatively, cells producing preferentially the diglycosylated form may be more readily targeted by the BSE agent.
The findings of Collinge et al. support the proposal that strain specificity is linked to distinct, heritable conformational states, and may be of great significance for the classification of human and animal prion diseases. Moreover, they provide further evidence that the BSE agent has been transmitted to man. This conclusion will be further reinforced if vCJD and BSE impart a similar signature to PrPres when transmitted to mice. One obvious extension of this work will be to compare the PrPres pattern of natural sheep scrapie to that of sheep with experimental BSE. A pattern difference, if present, may be used to determine if and to what extent BSE has been transmitted to sheep by contaminated feed, a question of particular importance for public health. Also interesting will be the search for type 4 PrPres in elderly patients with encephalopathy, since the aged have thus far, and for no obvious reasons, been spared by vCJD.
| Sporadic CJD | vCJD | |
| typical age of onset | 55-70 yr. | 19-39 (median 28) yr. |
| Presenting features | dementia, myoclonus | behavioral changes, ataxia, dysaesthesias |
| clinical course | rapidly progressive | insidious onset, prolonged course |
| codon 129 | predominantly homozygous | Met/Met 100% so far |
| deposits | synaptic deposits, rarely plaques | prominent florid plaques |
| banding pattern | type 1, type 2* | type 4 (~ to BSE in mice, macaques, others) |
Figure 1: On Western blots, different prion strains exhibits characteristic patterns of PrPres glycoforms, which are inherited even when passaging the infection across different species. Green arrows indicate successful transmission. The major glycoform of PrP is drawn in blue; arrows on western blots indicate increased mobility as compared to type 1. Provokingly, the vCJD pattern is similar to that seen in cows and other species with BSE. * J. Collinge, pers. comm.
References 1. Will, R.G., et al. Lancet 347, 921-925 (1996). 2. Chazot, G., et al. Lancet 347, 1181 (1996). 3. Collinge, J., Sidle, K.C.L., Ironside, J., Meads, A. & Hill, A. Nature 383, in press (1996). 4. Riesner, D., et al. Dev Biol Stand 80, 173-81 (1993). 5. Hsiao, K., et al. Nature 338, 342-5 (1989). 6. Medori, R., et al. Neurology 42, 669-70 (1992). 7. Palmer, M.S., Dryden, A.J., Hughes, J.T. & Collinge, J. Nature 352, 340-342 (1991). 8. Prusiner, S.B. Science 216, 136-44 (1982). 9. Oesch, B., et al. Cell 40, 735-46 (1985). 10. Basler, K., et al. Cell 46, 417-28 (1986). 11. Weissmann, C. Nature 349, 569-71 (1991). 12. B¸eler, H., et al. Cell 73, 1339-47 (1993). 13. Brandner, S., et al. Nature 379, 339-43 (1996). 14. Bruce, M.E., McBride, P.A., Jeffrey, M. & Scott, J.R. Mol Neurobiol 8, 105-12 (1994). 15. Weissmann, C. Nature 352, 679-83 (1991). 16. Bessen, R.A. & Marsh, R.F. J Virol 68, 7859-68 (1994). 17. Parchi, P., et al. Ann Neurol 38, 21-9 (1995).
John Collinge, Katie C. L. Sidle, Julie Meads, James Ironside, Andrew F. Hill 24 Oct 1996 Nature 382, 685-690 (1996) Received 5 September; accepted 10 October 1996.Strains of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are distinguished by differing physicochemical properties of PrPSc, the disease-related isoform of prion protein, which can be maintained on transmission to transgenic mice. 'New variant' Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) has strain characteristics distinct from other types of CJD and which resemble those of BSE transmitted to mice, domestic cat and macaque, consistent with BSE being the source of this new disease. Strain characteristics revealed here suggest that the prion protein may itself encode disease phenotype.
THE prion diseases or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are a group of neurodegenerative diseases that affect both humans and animals. They can be transmitted between mammals by inoculation with, or in some cases dietary exposure to, infected tissues. They are all associated with the accumulation in affected brains of an abnormal isoform of a host-encoded glycoprotein, prion protein (PrP), which seems to be the central (and possibly the sole) component of the transmissible agent or prion1. This disease-related isoform, PrPSc, can be distinguished from the normal cellular isoform, PrPC, by its insolubility and partial resistance to proteases. PrPSc is derived from PrPC by a post-translational mechanism2 which seems to involve a conformational, rather than covalent, modification3. Transgenic, human molecular genetic and in vitro conversion studies support a model for prion propagation which involves a direct protein-protein interaction between host PrPC and inoculated PrPSc, with PrPSc acting to promote further conversion of PrPC to PrPSc in an autocatalytic process which proceeds most efficiently when the interacting proteins are of identical primary structure4-7.
In addition to the unique biology of these diseases, interest in them has been intensified because of the epidemic of the prion disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)8 in the UK, and now in other countries, and the possibility that this may represent a significant threat to public health through ingestion of BSE-infected tissues. BSE is known to have caused prion disease in a number of other species, including domestic cats (feline spongiform encephalopathy) and captive exotic ungulates (nyala and kudu), presumably as a result of ingestion of BSE-contaminated feed9. The pathogenicity of bovine prions for humans is unknown, although the results of exposing transgenic mice expressing human prion protein, which lack a species barrier to human prions, indicate that induction of human prion production by bovine prions is inefficient10.
Although many converging lines of evidence support the 'protein only' hypothesis for prion propagation1, the existence of several distinct isolates or 'strains' of agent that can be stably passaged in inbred mice of the same prion protein genotype has yet to be explained satisfactorily within this model. Strains can be distinguished by their different incubation periods and patterns of neuropathology when passaged in mice11. A number of distinct strains of natural sheep scrapie are recognized, although BSE seems to be caused by a single strain of agent9.
Support for the idea that strain specificity is encoded by PrP alone is provided by study of two distinct strains of transmissible mink encephalopathy prions, designated hyper (HY) and drowsy (DY), which can be serially propagated in hamsters12. These strains can be distinguished by differing physicochemical properties of the accumulated PrPSc in the brains of affected hamsters13. After limited proteolysis, strain-specific migration patterns of PrPSc on polyacrylamide gels can be seen. DY PrPSc seems to be more protease-sensitive than HY PrPSc, producing a different banding pattern of PrPSc on western blots after proteinase K treatment. This relates to different amino- terminal ends of HY and DY PrPSc after protease treatment and implies differing conformations of HY and DY PrPSc (ref. 14). Furthermore, the demonstration that these strain-specific physicochemical properties can be maintained during in vitro production of protease-resistant PrP, when PrPC is mixed with HY or DY hamster PrPSc, further supports the concept that prion strains involve different PrP conformers15.
The human prion diseases occur in inherited, acquired and sporadic forms. About 15% are inherited, and are associated with coding mutations in the prion-protein gene (PRNP)16. Acquired prion diseases include kuru and iatrogenic Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease (CJD). Recognized iatrogenic routes of transmission are treatment with human cadaveric pituitary-derived growth hormone or gonadotrophin, dura mater or corneal grafting, and the use of inadequately sterilized neurosurgical instruments17. However, the majority of human prion disease occurs as sporadic CJD, in which pathogenic PRNP mutations and a history of iatrogenic exposure are absent. The majority of sporadic CJD cases are homozygous at polymorphic residue 129, a common protein polymorphism in human PrP that is known to be important in genetic susceptibility to human prion diseases6-16,18-20. Recently, the occurrence of a new form of human prion disease was reported in the United Kingdom, affecting unusually young people and having a highly consistent and unique clinicopathological pattern21. To date, all patients studied are homozygotes (for methionine) at polymorphic residue 129 of PrP and no coding mutations are present22. None has a history of iatrogenic exposure to human prions. This may indicate the arrival of a new risk factor for CJD in the United Kingdom, with dietary exposure to specified bovine offals, before their statutory exclusion from the human diet in 1989, seeming to be the most likely candidate. It is not known how many strains of human prions cause CJD; only two distinct patterns of protease-resistant PrP have been reported to date, associated with different clinicopathological types of sporadic CJD23.
We have investigated a wide range of cases of human prion disease to identify patterns of protease-resistant PrP that might indicate different, naturally occurring, prion strain types. We then studied 'new variant' CJD to determine whether it represents a distinct strain type that can be differentiated by molecular criteria from other forms of CJD. We demonstrate that sporadic and iatrogenic CJD is associated with three distinct patterns of protease-resistant PrP on western blots. Types 1 and 2, as previously described, are seen in sporadic CJD, and also in some iatrogenic CJD cases. A third type is seen in acquired prion diseases that arise from a peripheral route of exposure to prions. New variant CJD is associated with a unique and highly consistent appearance of protease- resistant PrP on western blots, involving a characteristic pattern of glycosylation. Whereas transmission of CJD to inbred mice produces a pattern characteristic of the inoculated CJD, transmission of BSE produces a glycoform ratio pattern closely similar to new variant CJD. Similarly, experimental BSE in macaques and naturally acquired BSE in domestic cats show an indistinguishable glycoform pattern to experimental murine BSE and new variant CJD. Transmission of types 1, 2 and 3 CJD to transgenic mice expressing human PrP reveals persistence or conversion of strain type dependent on PRNP codon-129 genotype, providing supportive evidence for the 'protein only' hypothesis of infectiousness and indicating that strain variation might be encoded by a combination of PrP conformation and glycosylation.
| TABLE 1 PRNP genotypes and banding type of protease-resistant PrP in sporadic, iatrogenic and new variant CJD | ||||||
| Classification | Codon-129 genotype | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Total |
| Sporadic | MM | 5 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| Sporadic | MV | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Sporadic | VV | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Iatrogenic (growth hormone) | MM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Iatrogenic (growth hormone) | MV | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Iatrogenic (growth hormone) | VV | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Iatrogenic (gonadotrophin) | VV | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Iatrogenic (dura mater) | MM | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| New variant | MM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| MM, methionine-homozygous genotype at PRNP codon 129; MV and VV, methionine/valine heterozygotes and valine homozygotes, respectively. | ||||||
Transmission studies to mice
We are studying the transmission characteristics of CJD in transgenic mice that express human PrP but not murine PrP (designated HuPrP+/+ Prn-p0/0 as they are homozygous for the human PrP transgene array)10. These mice lack a species barrier to human prions, and most inoculated mice succumb to prion disease with consistently short incubation periods10-24, usually in the region of 180-220 days (data not shown). This is markedly different from studies with non-transgenic mice using the same inocula, in which transmissions are infrequent and when they do occur they are associated with prolonged and variable incubation periods.
Transmission of type-2 CJD (of all three codon-129 genotypes) or type-3 CJD (which were all of genotype MV or VV) resulted in production of protease-resistant human PrP in the mice with an identical banding pattern to the primary inoculum (type 2 or 3, respectively) (Fig. 3). The HuPrP+/+ Prn-p0/0 mice used encode valine at residue 129 (ref. 25). However, transmission of type-1 CJD (which are all of genotype MM) resulted consistently in a type-2 banding pattern of human protease-resistant PrP produced in the mice (Fig. 3). The proportion of different glycoforms on western blots of brain homogenates from these mice was indistinguishable from that of the human cases themselves (data not shown).
This molecular marker can already be used in differential diagnosis of new variant CJD. New variant CJD is atypical both in its clinical features and electroencephalogram, such that diagnosis is dependent on neuropathology, either at autopsy or in some cases on brain biopsy. However, although the brain biopsy may demonstrate spongiform encephalopathy and PrP immunoreactivity adequate for a diagnosis of CJD, the characteristic neuropathological features necessary for a diagnosis of new variant CJD may not be present in the biopsy sample21. As PrP is expressed in the lymphoreticular system, and prion replication occurs in spleen and in other lymphoreticular tissues30, it may be possible to detect this molecular marker of new variant CJD in tonsil31 or lymph-node biopsy and thereby avoid brain biopsy.
The aetiology of sporadic CJD remains unclear but may involve somatic PRNP mutations or spontaneous conversion of PrPC to PrPSc as a rare stochastic event. Sporadic CJD is associated with type-1 or type-2 PrPSc. Type 1 is always associated with genotype MM, type 2 with all genotypes (MM, MV or VV). Type 3 is seen in iatrogenic CJD of genotype MV or VV. Only human PrP M129 seems to form type-1 PrPSc, whereas either human PrP M129 or human PrP V129 can produce type-2 PrPSc. As type-3 PrPSc is only seen in MV or VV individuals, it is possible that only human PrP V129 can form this type. As type-3 PrPSc is seen in peripherally acquired iatrogenic CJD cases, it is possible that this strain is selected in or preferentially produced by the lymphoreticular system, where prion replication first occurs in the experimentally transmitted disease in mice32. If such a PrPSc type were formed preferentially from human PrP V129, this could explain the excess of the PRNP codon-129 VV genotype among pituitary-hormone related CJD cases19,20,33. Further studies will be required to determine whether the type-3 pattern is a consistent marker of peripheral, as opposed to central, prion exposure or sporadic CJD. It is of note, however, that similar band sizes are seen in the type 4 (new variant CJD) pattern (which are of PRNP genotype MM), which seems to have arisen by peripheral (presumably dietary) exposure to bovine prions. The formation of particular PrPSc types seems to be constrained by host PRNP codon-129 genotype. This finding is supported by the observation that type-1 PrPSc converts to type 2 on passage in transgenic mice expressing the human PrP gene encoding valine at residue 129, whereas types 2 and 3 remain unchanged on such passage.
The different types of human PrPSc are seen in association with distinct clinicopathological phenotypes of CJD, and can be maintained on passage in mice, which indicates that these represent distinct human prion strains. The finding that strains appear to involve different post-translational modifications of PrP, which persist or (when PrP genotypes are mismatched) can be predictably converted between discrete strains on passage in mice, is consistent with a protein-only model of prion propagation in which strains are encoded by post-translational modification of PrP itself without the need for a nucleic acid or other cofactor. The bands seen on western analysis of PrP following proteolytic cleavage represent diglycosylated, monoglycosylated (at either of the two N- linked glycosylation sites) and unglycosylated PrP, and two separate features of these bands, shifts in mobility and differences in relative intensities, seem to be associated with strain type. The mobility shifts after cleavage, seen in all three bands, imply different PrP conformations (which may include differing states of assembly). The differences in glycoform ratios could indicate preferential conversion of particular glycoforms into particular conformational states. It has been argued that differing PrP glycosylation in different brain regions could provide a mechanism for the targeting of neuropathology seen with different strain types, as prions may replicate most efficiently in cell populations expressing a similarly glycosylated PrP on the cell surface34. Both PrP conformation and glycosylation may contribute to strain type but further studies will be required to investigate whether these two post-translational modifications of PrP can contribute to strain type independently, or are coupled phenomena.
1. Prusiner, S. B. Science 252, 1515-1522 (1991).
2. Caughey, B. Raymond, G. J. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18217-18223
(1991).
3. Pan, K.-M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10962-
10966 (1993).
4. Prusiner, S. B. et al. Cell 63, 673-686 (1990).
5. Weissmann, C. Nature 349, 569-571 (1991).
6. Palmer, M. S., Dryden, A. J., Hughes, J. T. Collinge, J. Nature 352,
340-342 (1991).
7. Kocisko, D. A. et al. Nature 370, 471-474 (1994).
8. Wells, G. A. H. Wilesmith, J. W. Brain Pathol. 5, 91-103 (1995).
9. Bruce, M. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 405-411
(1994).
10. Collinge, J. et al. Nature 378, 779-783 (1995).
11. Bruce, M. E., Fraser, H., McBride, P. A., Scott, J. R. Dickinson, A. G. in
Prion Diseases in Human and Animals (eds Prusiner, S. B., Collinge, J., Powell, J.
Anderton, B.) 497-508 (Ellis Horwood, London, 1992).
12. Marsh, R. F. Kimberlin, R. H. J. Infect. Dis. 131, 104-110 (1975).
13. Bessen, R. A. Marsh, R. F. J. Virol. 66, 2096-2101 (1992).
14. Bessen, R. A. Marsh, R. F. J. Virol. 68, 7859-7868 (1994).
15. Bessen, R. A. et al. Nature 375, 698-700 (1995).
16. Windl, O. et al. Hum. Genet. 98, 259-264 (1996).
17. Weller, R. O. Psychol. Med. 19, 1-4 (1989).
18. Baker, H. F. et al. Lancet 337, 1286 (1991).
19. Collinge, J., Palmer, M. S. Dryden, A. J. Lancet 337, 1441-1442
(1991).
20. Brown, P. et al. Neurology 44, 291-293 (1994).
21. Will, R. G. et al. Lancet 347, 921-925 (1996).
22. Collinge, J., Beck, J., Campbell, T., Estibeiro, K. Will, R. G.
Lancet 348, 56 (1996).
23. Parchi, P. et al. Ann. Neurol. 39, 669-680 (1996).
24. Telling, G. C. et al. Cell 83, 79-90 (1995).
25. Telling, G. C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9936-
9940 (1994).
26. Wyatt, J. M. et al. Vet. Rec. 129, 233-236 (1991).
27. Lasmezas, C. I. et al. Nature 381, 743-744 (1996).
28. Brown, P., Preece, M. A. Will, R. G. Lancet 340, 24-27 (1992).
29. Page, G. Nature 382, 381 (1996).
30. Kimberlin, R. H. Walker, C. A. Virus Res. 12, 201-211 (1989).
31. Schreuder, B. E. C., van Keulen, L. J. M., Vromans, M. E. W., Langeveld, J. P. M.
Smits, M. A. Nature 381, 563 (1996).
32. Kimberlin, R. H. Walker, C. A. J. Gen. Virol. 69, 2953-2960
(1988).
33. Laplanche, J.-L. et al. Neurology 44, 2347-2351 (1994).
34. Haraguchi, T. et al. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274, 1-13
(1989).
35. Palmer, M. S. Hum. Mutat. 7, 280-281 (1996).
36. Laemmli, U. K. Nature 227, 680-685 (1970).
37. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. Gordon, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76,
4350-4354 (1979).
38. Kascsak, R. J. et al. J. Virol. 61, 3688-3693 (1987).
39. Serban, D., Taraboulos, A., DeArmond, S. J. Prusiner, S. B.
Neurology 40, 110-117 (1990).
40. Carlson, G. A. et al. Cell 46, 503-511 (1986).
41. Bueler, H. et al. Nature 356, 577-582 (1992).
42. Whittington, M. A. et al. Nature Genet. 9, 197-201 (1995).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank all clinicians and neuropathologists who have referred CJD cases to the National CJD Surveillance Unit or to the Prion Disease Group. We also thank M. Desbruslais, J.Beck, I. Gowland, T. OMahony, A. Clarke and J. Sealby for their assistance with these studies; D.Dormont and C. Lasmezas for generously supplying tissue from macaque BSE; G. Pearson for tissue from feline spongiform encephalopathy, and R. Bradley and M. Dawson for tissues from BSE-affected cattle; S. B. Prusiner for providing R073 antibody and Tg152 mice, R. Kascsak for 3F4 antibody and C. Weissmann and S. B. Prusiner for PrP null mice; and J. Wadsworth for statistical advice. This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Biology of Spongiform Encephalopathies Programme) and the David and Frederick Barclay Foundation.
Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 1996
Registered No. 785998 England.