British scientists report finding new clues to Alzheimer's
Progress on Alzheimer neurotangles Alzheimer's filaments in vitro

Alzheimers mental impairment is not normal in elderly
New mouse model boosts Alzheimers' research
Spotting Alzheimer's disease earlier is possible in many cases
Alzheimer's and environment
Family battling over Al;zheimer victim
Personal genetics, Alzheimer's test, and insurance companies

Progress on Alzheimer neurotangles

Nature 10.10.96

Those who study Alzheimer's disease are divided into two camps: the ßaptists, who see ß-amyloid plaques as the main cause of the disease, and the tauists, who believe that tau fibrils are to blame. A connection between the two comes with the discovery that glycosaminoglycans, which are known to be associated with plaques, are necessary for the assembly of tau into fibrils.

British scientists report finding new clues to Alzheimer's

Reuter Information Service

LONDON (Oct 9, 1996 9:48 p.m. EDT) - British scientists have found new clues about one of the classic pathological features of Alzheimer's disease that could eventually lead to an effective treatment for the degenerative brain illness.

In a report in the scientific journal Nature on Wednesday, Michel Goedert and colleagues at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, England, described how they reproduced abnormal filaments which make up neurofibrillary "tangles" - one of the two defining characteristics of Alzheimer's disease.

"It is the first time this has been done," Goedert told Reuters in a telephone interview. To make the filaments, Goedert mixed a protein called "tau" with substances known as glycosaminoglycans, which are sugars. The filaments make up the neurofibrillary tangles.

"The number of tangles (in the brain tissues of Alzheimer patients) correlates quite well with degrees of impairment. The more angles, the greater the impairment," he added. Goedert said the finding could present a way in which drugs to combat the tangles may be tested in laboratory conditions.

"Interactions between sulphated glycosaminoglycans and tau may thus be the central event in the development of nerufibrillary pathology in Alzheimer's disease," Goedert wrote in Nature.

Alzheimer's disease, which characterised by dementia and disorientation, afflicts nearly 10 percent of people over the age of 65 worldwide. Former U.S. president Ronald Reagan is a sufferer, as was the late American actress Rita Hayworth. The disease robs people of their memories and their ability to think, learn and take care of themselves.


Alzheimer's filaments in vitro

Nature 382, 550-553 (1996)

A defining characteristic of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease is the presence of neurofibrillary deposits. These are largely made up of paired helical filaments (PHFs), composed of the microtubule-associated protein tau in a hyperphosphorylated state. But what triggers their formation? Goedert et al. show that under physiological conditions in vitro, sulphated glycosaminoglycans such as heparin induce tau (whether phosphorylated or not) to form PHFs. Moreover, heparin prevents tau from binding to microtubules, promoting microtubule disassembly, and heparan sulphate is found together with tau in affected regions of the brain from the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease. Sulphated glycosaminoglycans may therefore play a key role in the pathology of the condition.
M Goedert, R Jakes, M G Spillantini, M Hasegawa, M J Smith & R A Crowther
Assembly of microtubule-associated protein tau into Alzheimer-like filaments induced by sulphated glycosaminoglycans


Guidelines on Alzheimers and aging say mental impairment is not normal in elderly

Reuter Information Service (Sep 26, 1996 00:18 a.m. EDT)

WASHINGTON - Mental impairment is not a "normal" part of aging and many cases of dementia can be treated, according to U.S. health guidelines released Wednesday. Even when the problem cannot be cured, such as Alzheimer's disease, early diagnosis is still advisable. "Early recognition of Alzheimer's disease or identification of other types of dementias can prevent costly and inappropriate treatment and give patients and family members time to address the complex financial, legal and medical conditions these conditions present," said Paul Costa of the National Institute on Aging, and the co-chair of the panel that drew up the guidelines.

The clinical practice guidelines are the last in a series drawn up by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. About one in five apparent cases of dementia are treatable, due to such disorders as depression or drug interaction, which is a particular problem among older people taking several medications for chronic conditions.

Yet many people, including some health care professionals, regard such symptoms as a difficulty absorbing new information, problems in handling complex tasks or trouble with spatial orientation as sad but normal parts of aging.

But according to the guidelines, they are instead signals that a doctor should be consulted. If Alzheimer's is suspected, the elderly person should be followed carefully.


Spotting Alzheimer's disease earlier is possible in many cases

The Associated Press WASHINGTON Sep 26, 1996

Forgetfulness is not a part of growing old -- and doctors, family members and patients should regard it as medically important, according to new federal guidelines for treating Alzheimer's disease. The guidelines, issued by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, said the memory-destroying fatal disorder often goes undiagnosed in early stages by primary care doctors.

"Many health care professionals, as well as patients, their families and friends, mistakenly view the early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease as inevitable consequences of aging," said Health and Human Services secretary Donna R. Shalala. In modern managed care medical practices, many patients need the approval of primary care doctors to seek the treatment of specialists, said Cheryl Williams, vice president of medical and scientific affairs of the Alzheimer's Association. Many primary care doctors simply don't recognize the early of symptoms of the memory-destroying disease.

Williams said about 25 percent of Alzheimer's patients could be diagnosed earlier if primary care physicians were alerted to look for the disease and to eliminate other causes of memory loss. "Early recognition of Alzheimer's disease, or identification of other types of dementias, can prevent costly and inappropriate treatment, and give patients and family members time to address complex financial, legal and medical issues these conditions present," said Paul T. Costa Jr. of the National Institute of Aging and a co-author of the guidelines.

About 20 percent of dementias in the elderly are caused by conditions that can be treated and improved. Experts said the new guidelines will help doctors recognize and treat these conditions. Williams said a final, positive verification of Alzheimer's can be made only at autopsy, but that specialists now are quick to detect evidence of the disorder. Primary care doctors, however, must recognize patients who have dementia in order for patients to be referred to specialist, she said.


Alzheimer's and environment

The Associated Press

CHICAGO (Sep 25, 1996 01:42 a.m. EDT) -- Alzheimer's disease among men of Japanese ancestry is twice as common in Hawaii as it is in Japan, boosting the theory that environmental factors play a role in the development of the mind-robbing illness, researchers say.

Exactly what those environmental factors are is unclear, but one of the researchers, Dr. Lon White of the National Institute on Aging, speculated that they might include exposure to pesticides on Hawaiian plantations and the stress of moving from Japan to Hawaii. The research was reported in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.

Previous research into possible environmental causes has linked Alzheimer's with a low education level, excess zinc and serious head injuries, although some researchers have challenged those results.

The latest study involved 3,734 Japanese-American men who were enrolled in a heart study in the 1960s and tracked through the early 1990s. About 15 percent were born in Japan and moved at an early age to Hawaii. The rest were born in Hawaii to Japanese-born parents who left their homeland for a better life.

The participants were 71 to 93 years old, with an average age of 78. Alzheimer's was believed to be present in 5.4 percent of the subjects. That compared with a rate of 1.5 percent found in a recent Japanese study of 887 Hisayama residents 65 and older. Other Japanese studies have found similar rates, the researchers said.

"These observations lead us to speculate that environmental or cultural exposures associated with migration from Japan to Hawaii may have influenced the development" of Alzheimer's disease, White said.

Dr. David Bennett, associate director of Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center in Chicago, called the study provocative but flawed because it involved comparing studies that may have had different designs and methods.


Family battling over man who apparently overdosed.

Associated Press

CASTRO VALLEY, Calif. -- A judge has taken custody privileges away from the wife of an Alzheimer's patient who apparently overdosed on sleeping pills and whiskey. Dr. Gerald Klooster, who had been the subject of an intense nine-month custody battle, was in critical condition Wednesday, unconscious and breathing with the help of a ventilator, family members said. Superior Court Judge William McKinstry said if Klooster recovers, the couple's daughter, Kristen Hamstra, must take custody of him -- at least until a sheriff's investigation is completed.

In June, Klooster returned to the Castro Valley home he has shared with his wife, Ruth, for many years. He had been taken by his son, Chip Klooster, to live in Michigan. The custody dispute began after the younger Klooster learned his mother had contacted assisted-suicide advocate Dr. Jack Kevorkian about her ailing husband. Chip Klooster feared his father, a retired obstetrician, was being pushed into killing himself.

On Tuesday, Ruth Klooster told authorities she found her husband unconscious and slumped against a kitchen cabinet in his underwear and a bathrobe. Nearby were a bottle of whiskey, an empty 100-tablet medicine bottle labeled busitol sodium, a barbiturate, and a coffee cup with some whiskey in it.

''We're calling it an attempted suicide with suspicious circumstances,'' said sheriff's Lt. Dave Hoig. ''We're not pointing any fingers, but there are several unanswered questions, especially because of the family involved.''

Authorities will fingerprint the whiskey and medication bottles. But Hoig said that evidence would not necessarily indicate whether Klooster acted alone. Under California law, it is a felony to advise in an assisted suicide or even encourage it. Asked if her mother could have assisted in the overdose, Hamstra -- who sided with her mother in the custody dispute -- replied, ''Absolutely not. My mother is devastated.'' Chip Klooster, who has threatened to file a wrongful death suit if his father died suspiciously, said he was in shock. ''All I can say is 'I told everybody this was going to happen,' '' he said.


New mouse model boosts Alzheimers' research

Reuter Information Service (Oct 3, 1996)

WASHINGTON - A new genetically modified mouse that mimics Alzheimer's disease should boost drug research and help scientists decipher the strange tangles of plaque in patients' brains, scientists said on Thursday. A report on the transgenic mice, which contain a human gene for an early-onset form of Alzheimer's, appears Friday in the journal Science.

"This is the first time anyone has shown this association between the plaques and the disfunctional learning and dementia in mice," said Dr. Karen Hsiao, the University of Minnesota neurologist who developed the mouse. An earlier transgenic mouse displayed some aspects of Alzheimer's, but according to researchers at the National Institutes of Health and the Chicago-bases Alzheimer's Association, both of which helped fund Hsiao's research, this one provides a more complete model for researchers.

Hsiao said in a telephone interview she will make the mouse widely available to academic researchers trying to understanding the heart-breaking disorder that robs patients of their memories and their independence. The University of Minnesota is also licensing the mouse to the Mayo Clinic, which through its Mayo Medical Ventures will sell the mice to pharmaceutical companies on a nonexclusive basis so that they can test compounds that could delay or conquer the disease, Hsiao said. A May spokesman was not immediately available to comment on the arrangement.

"There are a lot of compounds waiting to be tested and the pharmaceutical industry can use these mice," she said. "And academics can use it to try to understand what causes this disease." According to the Alzheimer's Association, the ailment afflicts more than 4 million Americans. Among them is former President Ronald Reagan. It is expected to become an even greater, and more expensive, problem as the baby boomers age.

There is no guarantee that a drug that works to slow down, or eventually even cure, Alzheimer's in mice will have the same effect in humans but scientists believe the transgenic rodent is an excellent model. In addition to being a testing ground for drugs, the genetically altered mice may also finally help scientists resolve the debate about the role of plaque in the brain -- whether plaque causes Alzheimer's or is a manifestation of it.

"We can't kill people to find out what is going on in their brain," said Hsaio, who suspects that something goes awry in the brain before formation of plaque. "The mice we can look at." Her lab worked with a long-lived hybrid mouse, injecting its eggs with a gene from a Swedish family with a history of early onset Alzheimer's. That gene directs production of a protein that forms the plaques.

The mice were tested against a control group in how well they learned to negotiate a water maze. Young mice performed well but as they aged, the transgenic mice showed more and more impairment, confusion and dementia. After death, the transgenic ones also displayed the plaque in the brain. Hsaio wants to now continue studying these patterns, examining the mice at closer intervals to get a better sense of when the plaque forms and the role it plays.




The people who want to look inside your genes - Alzheimer's test

Tom Wilkie

The Guardian ... 2 October 1996

As our genetic inheritance is unravelled to reveal more about the diseases we are likely to sustain, the insurance industry has started to campaign for greater access to our most intimate secrets. Tom Wilkie listens in to the latest debate and assesses the implications

Once, the "Man from the Pru" used to ring our doorbells and be invited into our homes to collect the family's insurance premium. Now he, and the other insurance companies, are asking for more intimate access - to our DNA. They want to know what genes we have inherited from our parents and, therefore, when we are likely to die.

For the past five years, British geneticists have been trying, in vain, to persuade the insurance companies that they need not pry into people's genetic inheritance. Insurers, for their part, fear that people who know from a genetic test that they are liable to develop a fatal disease later in life will pile on the life insurance to provide for their dependants after their death - without declaring the test result on the application form.

Last week, in the normally sedate surroundings of the Royal Society in London, frustration at the lack of dialogue between the two sides boiled over into acrimonious exchanges. Peter Harper, one of the country's leading geneticists, sparked the furore when he warned that if applicants for insurance feel that the results of a DNA test done by their doctor might be held against them, they would buy do-it-yourself genetic test-kits even though they had not received counselling about the consequences of a bad result: "I am totally against the uncritical and widespread application of genetic tests."

This was all too much for Mary Reynolds, chief medical officer of Canada Life. She promptly condemned Harper for supporting people who wanted to latch on to a "gravy train". Insurers are right, she insisted, to demand to see the results of any genetic tests that an applicant may have had for other reasons.

But at least one actuary seemed not so sure. Angus MacDonald said life insurance companies could survive perfectly well without getting access to people's genetic test results - at worst premiums might rise by 10 per cent for everyone; they would not double, he said. MacDonald's Scots accent, his sober suit, and his dispassionate discourse on the statistics of human mortality made it seem as if he had stepped straight from one of the coolly elegant Georgian buildings that house the great life assurance companies in the heart of Edinburgh. In fact, he lectures in actuarial mathematics in the modernistic campus of Heriot-Watt university on the city's fringes.

There is something about regarding the Grim Reaper's visits not as a series of individual tragedies but as an opportunity to compile statistics on frequencies and distributions that seems to appeal to the Scot, for there were many Scottish voices to be heard among the actuaries at the Royal Society. But there was a feeling that if the insurance industry were to change its accent to an American one, then the genetic revolution taking place in laboratories around the world would cause the industry and its customers severe problems.

In Britain, the development of a genetic test to pick out those who are at higher risk of Alzheimer's disease later in life has happened just when there are moves within the NHS to shift long-term care for the elderly from medical to social provision for which people would be encouraged to take out private cover for care in their old age. In the US, insurers that cover long-term care are already interested in the genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's and in excluding those who carry higher risk.

Medical care, and long-term care for the elderly, the meeting heard, could only be provided on a basis of universal solidarity - with everyone contributing according to their ability to pay and receiving benefits according to their need. Genetics may make more, not less, necessary the universal provision that the NHS once promised "from the cradle to the grave". One of the most surprising aspects of the meeting was to hear geneticists, the representatives of the actuarial profession (and a sprinkling of insurers also) praising the NHS in terms more enthusiastic than have been heard recently from the Labour Party.

If Britain goes down the American road towards private health insurance, or private insurance for long-term care in old age, then insurers would be forced to take people's genes into account. In their own legitimate commercial interests, insurers would refuse to cover those people most at risk of, say, Alzheimer's disease - the people who need such cover most.

Last week's debate had its roots in two developments during the 1980s. Aids sent the insurance companies in Britain into psychological shock. The industry had been making a tidy living selling insurance to young males who, once they have got past the age of 20, are relatively good risks. The possibility that some of them might be infected with HIV made the industry nervous about insuring people who appear healthy today but who might be at risk of illness later.

The second development is an international scientific programme known as the Human Genome Project whose aim is to tease out and examine every one of the 100,000 or so genes in human DNA. For obvious reasons, many researchers have started their search by looking at the genes which, when defective, result in disease. The hope is that when the genes are isolated and the DNA damage identified, it might be possible to devise ways of correcting the disorder (not necessarily by stitching in new genes - gene therapy - but by conventional pharmaceuticals too). The search has already yielded some spectacular successes: the genes responsible for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease have already been isolated, and the genetic flaws that result in disease identified. But cures remain, as yet, elusive.

What interests the insurance companies is that finding a gene does make predictive testing possible. Huntington's disease, for example, is a degenerative brain condition that usually sets in when the sufferer is in his or her mid-40s. Healthy people in their twenties who know that they are at risk - because one parent has developed the disease - can now have their own DNA tested to see if they carry the mutation.

Sensitised by their experience with Aids in the 1980s, the insurers worried that here again could be a group of people who appear healthy at the time a policy is taken out, but who will later suffer fatal disease. Worse was the possibility that those who know they have the Huntington's mutation may decide to insure their lives for hefty amounts, so that their dependants are catered for after their death. To avoid the costs of such weighted selections, insurers want to know the results of every genetic test that applicants for insurance policies have had.

But MacDonald's analysis suggests that the costs might not be so great as had been feared - at least for average-sized policies. The costs do mount up, he conceded, if the amount insured is twice or three times the average. In such cases, there might have to be a limit above which insurers were free to ask for the results of any genetic tests. Alternatively, it might be possible to have "retrospective pricing" of insurance policies, as happens in Germany, he suggested. Premiums are higher but if, at the end of an ordinary life insurance policy, the company discovers it had over-estimated the risk and therefore charged premiums that were too high, it would return some of them as a "with profits" payment. The higher initial premiums of a "with profits" system meant that German insurance companies were more relaxed about the Aids epidemic than their British counterparts. The German companies, said MacDonald, could adjust to unforeseen claims by reducing the with-profits payout at the end of normal policies.

But another American development may undermine the chances of the insurance industry being able to dispense with genetic information for all but the biggest of policies. In Britain, 95 per cent of applicants get life cover at standard rates, about four per cent have to pay higher premiums because they represent a higher risk, while one per cent are rejected as uninsurable. In the US, however, some companies are starting to give cheap rates to "preferred lives" - the superfit and healthy. The British industry has a choice: it can try to expand the insurance market to reach more than the 30 per cent of the population who are insured at present, or it can differentiate within the existing assured population.

One of the factors that American insurers take into account in determining who are the "preferred lives" is family history of disease. Although the health of one's parents is a crude measure of the genes that they have passed on, one speaker drew gasps of incredulity when he asserted that the insurance industry did not regard family history as "genetic information". In theory, genetic tests would make this crude information precise.

And information about the genetics of common diseases is going to be available, said John Bell, professor of clinical medicine at Oxford University. At first, the genome project succeeded in teasing out only the genes for comparatively rare disorders, such as Huntington's, which are due to damage in a single gene. Now the emphasis is shifting, said Bell, "to more common diseases which are more interesting to the pharmaceutical industry", such as cancer and heart disease. But it is not just the drugs companies that are interested in the shift, he noted dryly: "the insurance industry may have more interest in understanding conditions that have high prevalence". At Bell's own laboratory in Oxford, scientists have already started to identify genes that confer a susceptibility to hypertension (high blood pressure), asthma, adult-onset diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease. He warned though that, for common diseases, there is no simple "if you have the gene you will get the disease" link. The diseases involve a complex interplay of genes with each other and with the environment (including diet) that may confer a high risk on some individuals. "Stop thinking about them as genes but instead as 'risk factors'."

At present, the available genetic tests are for such rare conditions that it is not worth the insurers demanding that everyone should undergo a test before being granted insurance. But when tests for Bell's "risk factors" for common diseases become available, will the insurers then demand that we undergo them?

Well, the geneticists and the actuaries at the Royal Society meeting displayed, in the flesh so to speak, a clear difference of view about the relative importance of genes and environment. Despite their professional belief in the importance of genes, every one of the scientists had the lean look of people who jogged or took other vigorous exercise regularly - they were clearly not leaving their chances of heart disease up to their genes. In contrast, the insurers were trenchermen - implicitly relying on their genes to ensure that regular good business lunches would not adversely affect their actuarial chances of heart disease.

Tom Wilkie's book about the impact of the new genetics, Perilous Knowledge - The Human Genome Project and its Implications, is published in paperback by Faber and Faber at £7.99